I am a regular reader of the Tasmanian Times. Sometimes the reading is difficult. I have lifted this with permission straight from the Tasmanian times.
Mungo MacCallum Quarterly Essay, Australian Story, Kevin Rudd and the Lucky Country
Clancy from the other side.
He was poisoning the water when he chanced upon a slaughter
So he joined in patriotically to massacre and rape
And he sees the vision splendid of the native problem ended
And a land made safe for cattle from Tasmania to the Cape
In my genocidal fancy visions come to me of Clancy
With a gin across his saddle and her children in pursuit;
As he leaves behind their crying he tots up the dead and dying
And he calculates his bounty and gets ready for a root.
With commendable persistence Clancy follows the resistance
And you’ll find him the rearguard with the priests and their Te
Deums.
While the troopers do the shooting Clancy rides behind them,
looting;
There’s tjuringas for collectors and some heads for the museums.
And when he meets a Jack, Clancy sometimes offers baccy,
And many other presents to improve the shining hour.
While his cobbers call him silly, he smiles and boils his billy
For there’s measles in the blanket rolls and strychnine in the flour.
And a firm but friendly parson thinks he’ll try a little arson
To exorcise the dreaming with his candle, book and bell;
His redeemer loudly praising, he sets all the gunyahs blazing
To civilise the heathen with a touch of Christian hell.
As he contemplates the scene he can remember Truganini
And Pemulwuy and Banelon and others of their kind
And on gentle summer breezes he can sense the new diseases
That will carry their descendants out of sight and out of mind.
And the sturdy stockhorse whinnies as he tramples piccaninnies
And the rider cracks his stockwhip at the ones who run away
And above the odd death rattle he can hear the lowing cattle
As the drover brings them into camp to end a perfect day.
*************************************
“Rudd would also acknowledge that there was another side to Clancy which Paterson does not mention. In spite of the poets assertion that no blood was shed in the pioneering days, actually quite a lot was; it’s just that very little of it was white man’s blood. For Paterson, Indigenous Australians were barely perceptible; if seen at all, they were lovable clowns, figures of fun, not part of the real narrative.”
Mungo MacCallum writing in the latest Quarterly Essay: HERE.
Comments on this entry are closed.
Not a nice lot our ancestors! I don’t know that much has changed really. ‘Sad’ doesn’t truly do it justice does it?
I always get sad when I read about the wiping out of the Tasmanian aboriginals. Such a waste of life for no good reason.
I read this in the TT the other day. Sad, very sad, but also, very true.
thank you for posting this, Kim
I came to say Happy Christmas but that sounds a little trite now – well meant though.
Thank you for the post.
The God of False Advertising will love this. Thankyou for distributing it to a wider audience. You’ve won yourself a new regular reader in me.